Wednesday, April 23, 2008

With diesel and oil on the rise, shippers look for more options

Jeff Berman, Group News Editor -- Logistics Management, 4/22/2008

WALTHAM, Mass.—As the price of diesel gasoline continues to go up at an unprecedented pace, shippers say they are covering new ground when it comes to making decisions about how to manage transportation costs.

To put this into perspective, the United States Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration (EIA) office said yesterday that the average price per gallon of diesel is currently $4.143 per gallon—representing an 8.4 cent spike over last week’s $4.059, which marked the first time the $4 per gallon average has ever occurred. This current total is nearly $1.30 more per gallon than it was a year ago at this time.

What’s more, the average price of a barrel of crude oil is slightly more than $117 per gallon on the heels of six straight days of increases. And the average price of retail gasoline is $3.503, according to figures released early today by the AAA and the Oil Price Information Service (OPIS). AAA and OPIS also reported that according to their data diesel hit $4.204 today.

The tenuous situation is making it hard for experts to target just how high prices will go and what the future holds.

“It is uncharted territory…I don’t think we are done, but I have to believe we are in the eighth or ninth inning,” OPIS Chief Oil Analyst Tom Kloza said in an Associated Press report.

The ongoing run-up in oil and gas prices has been front and center for shippers, carriers, and consumers alike, and it has resulted in news on a near daily basis. Some recent developments include:

With the current situation being so unpredictable, shippers are looking at various approaches to lighten their loads to make supply chain operations more manageable—and without breaking the bank on fuel costs.

“It is creating a renewed emphasis on looking at things like TMS (transportation management systems), which really aligns with reducing freight costs and greenhouse gas emissions,” said Tony Quartarro, executive vice president of supply chain at Burt’s Bees, a Morrisville, N.C.-based provider of personal care and natural skin care products. “This situation also provides [shippers with] a great economic impetus to do good from a people, planet, and profit perspective. We are all trying to reduce the weight we are shipping and how to best optimize it. And by reviewing where your sources of supply are coming from, you can get closer and local and reduce your footprint that way.”

Other shippers told LM that they will consider augmenting how they load packages in an effort to combat fuel costs. They said they plan to look at things like removing package weight and dunnage where they can.

Another option for shippers to consider is considering ways to better manage their fuel “supply portfolio,” according to Rich Cilento, president and CEO of FuelQuest, a provider of Web-based supply chain management and tax automation technologies for suppliers, distributors, buyers, and traders of petroleum products and other energy commodities.

“Fuel buyers need to realize that there are new “norms” in the U.S. and Global fuel marketplace—higher crude prices, tighter or more controlled supply options, and increased price volatility,” said Cilento in an interview. “A fuel buyer can manage at these new norms by establishing a more sophisticated and established “supply portfolio,” leveraging larger and more secure supply options, procuring fuel as far up into the fuel supply chain as possible, as well as managing the costs of acquisition (transportation) and storage (inventories) of the fuel.”

On the political front, Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the “Diesel Parity Tax Act,” which would lower the federal diesel tax from 24.3 cents per gallon to 18.3 cents, matching retail gasoline.

"Our trucking industry and small businesses are in a crisis and drastic steps need to be undertaken by Congress,” said Snowe in a statement. “The situation for Maine’s trucking industry is simply untenable and we need immediate action to lower the price of fuel for small businesses that are impacted by these historic costs.”

McCain wants federal fuel tax suspended

Trucking Headlines

McCain wants federal fuel tax suspended
By eTrucker Staff


Pacer Transport owner-operator John Evans of Monroe, La., fuels up in Tuscaloosa, Ala., where a per-gallon state tax of 19 cents is added to the per-gallon federal tax of 24.4 cents.
U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the pre- sumptive Re- publican pres- idential nominee, is proposing that from Memorial Day to Labor Day the federal government suspend all motor fuel taxes and suspend purchases of oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

McCain included the proposals in an April 15 speech at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh.

Technically, McCain called for just a suspension on “all taxes on gasoline,” but another comment in his speech makes it clear that he intends for the summer tax holiday to apply to diesel as well: “The effect will be an immediate economic stimulus -- taking a few dollars off the price of a tank of gas every time a family, a farmer, or trucker stops to fill up.”

Politicians and pundits routinely refer to "the gas tax" although they almost always mean the diesel tax as well. The federal tax on gasoline is 18.4 cents per gallon, the federal tax on diesel 24.4 cents per gallon.

“Because the cost of gas affects the price of food, packaging, and just about everything else, these immediate steps will help to spread relief across the American economy,” McCain said.

Leaders of a key committee in the U.S. House of Representatives slammed McCain’s proposal, saying it would have little effect on fuel prices but would cost states billions of dollars in highway safety and construction funds, laying off construction workers and worsening congestion.

Because the federal per-gallon fuel tax has been fixed for years while the average per-gallon price of fuel has more than tripled, the federal tax is to blame for an ever-smaller portion of the price, said a joint statement by U.S. Reps. James Oberstar, D-Minn., and Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., chairmen of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee and its highways subcommittee, respectively.

“Sen. McCain has said he doesn’t understand the economy. His gas tax proposal proves that point,” Oberstar and DeFazio said. “The McCain proposal would bring the Highway Trust Fund, which finances federal highway, highway safety, and transit infrastructure investments, to the edge of insolvency.”

Moreover, McCain's proposal does not assure the price of fuel actually would drop, “making it likely that oil companies would simply pocket the difference," Oberstar and DeFazio said.